Have you ever wondered about the purpose of
the female role in modern day life? The perceived nature and purpose of women
and how it is believed they should be portrayed in the Common Era is an
understanding that is confusing even today. In this century it is safe to say
that women don’t want to be a part of modern society, but fight to be a part of
it at the same time. Confused? You should be. It’s the age of feminism. A delusion
to escape what no longer exists, but be used as an excuse to tackle the world
of male dominance. A dominance that died out in the second half of the 20th
century.
Is this a sexist statement? Well, yes it is
and no it isn't. Why? Let me explain…
Feminism was the female stance to empower
women all over the world. Its purpose wasn't merely as much to equalise their
existence in the same effect as their male counterparts, but to prove that
women were just as important. In this case it was a little of both.
Feminism could be considered a male
undertaking or cause. Alas it is a man’s fault that feminism exists or is it?
Since the dawn of the 20th century, socialism paved the way forward
for democracies to conduct a sense of governance that empowered the people. With
this ‘privilege’ it expanded into a ‘right’ and grew stronger throughout the
developing 20th century of politics. It would be 100% blasphemous to
state that women don’t have the right to vote or the right to express
themselves in the same environment as men at current as was the norm over more
than a century ago. The times have indeed changed for the greater good. Women now
have the same rights as men regardless of what any feminist group can indicate.
Falsified reports to minimise constitutional effect to empower male superiority
is disorientating and is used daily by feminist groups all over the world. It can
only be substantiated in an undemocratic society, but the loudest ones usually
come from those where their democratically elected governments have allowed
them to do so.
Although their purpose to exist is no longer necessary, the
right to exercise this right is enshrined though most constitutions in the
democratic world and it is a relief that these rights exists as they should do.
With the change of time, we see a vast
growing society of men and women unfamiliar with the sense of self empowerment
or superiority. Women are qualified to serve the same positions as men. This of course shows how woman’s rights have
expanded and progressed since WWII. It embarked
on a journey where the point would stretch beyond the limit. From as early as
the 90’s and 80’s the female purpose has made more than just the average mark
on the world. It has seen women become empowered in greater circumstances than
before. Women were taking office and
using their sense of victory to change the male view of dominance. From Prime
Ministers to Presidents, Advocates and Judges, doctors and more, presence of
women has not gone unnoticed and is appreciated as it should be respectfully.
Has feminism flowered into a thinking
society or has it mocked itself in the general idea that there is a need for it
when there isn't? Since the dawn of the 21st century, female
dominance has overthrown a lot of male empowered industry as well as
government. We see women taking decisive roles in government, law environments and
industry and this is splendid to see. It shows how far society has expanded and
how society has outgrown its former conservative self of servant and become
self master.
Now that women have taken centre stage, has
it changed the view of how women are perceived? Has it changed the need for
feminism? When a man says no and a woman says yes, should it only be focused on
what a woman wants? No, because this alone is how feminism uses the card of
vulnerability to seek superiority. It is almost like a scheme where woman have
flocked together into a secret society to find fault in all that men do. This is
a sexist approach and a misrepresentation of what was once a respectable
organisation.
In countries like South Africa, the
political landscape shows that there is no gender discrimination by the
representation of women in politics. The political system however is
discriminatory towards women with a concern for life in South Africa. Most political
parties in South Africa have respectable branches which serves a youth league
and a woman’s league. The very audacity for their politics to insist that
gender discrimination is a no-no in the new democratic South Africa, but insists
on having an acclaimed woman’s league for whatever party you support shows that
feminism is alive and well in their political environment. It also allows women
to degrade themselves by the need to join a woman’s league as opposed to
joining the main political party to get the benefit of the doubt. Is it wrong
for women to join the main party and fight alongside the men that will keep
them in the same place for the rest of their lives? Why not show them that in
politics, your gender has an equal right as opposed to individual equality. The
very fact that they have to report their concern to the head of the league
tarnishes not only their integrity, but takes away their right to exercise their
voice, no-one will hear their views except the league of women.
We have seen the development of how
wrongful feminism is used by the fakes and phonies in the Common Era as much as
how prisoners use religion to get parole; in most cases an overwhelming number
of alleged loyal feminists are disobedient to the purpose and moral structure
of their cause as well as in breech of their code of ethics.
From as simple as a man accidentally
rubbing his shoulder against a woman’s shoulder in public and being accused of
assault is the custom of the new age of feminism. This proclivity is the norm
when it comes to feminism and it is a charge that is out of order in a modern
society. In other words feminism is an
excuse used by alleged feminists who use the need to find fault at whatever
cost to humiliate men when it isn’t necessary.
In my view, a woman who calls herself a
feminist is a woman no more. This is a heavy sexist charge indeed, but it has a
strong purpose. Should a woman join a group to feel empowered? Is this not an
insult on a woman’s well-being that she needs to join a group to know where she
stands in the world? I suppose that it is a fair point of feminism. That a
woman should sell her soul to group of overly excited women to empower herself
as well as the initial group to incite bigotry all over the world. It is sadly the
case in modern day life. Sure it is shockingly sad to absorb what is a neutral
perspective on feminism, but it is a true factor of how it misrepresents women
and their purpose.
As a man, I feel no need to be superior, it
never crossed my mind to be and it never will. I have always had the utmost
respect for people of all backgrounds and this will remain the case until the
day I die. However, I will not stand silent at the hands of feminism and allow
a cult of bigots to dominate society on the grounds of what they feel suits
fit. The need for feminism no longer exists in society because women needn't feel
inferior to anyone. Nor should a woman feel the need to seek protection from
the very people she opposes when it suits her. It is degrading to mankind.
A modern day woman with a head on her
shoulders knows her own path in life. A modern day woman is a woman who sets
goals for herself and achieves them without fail. A modern day woman is a woman
who takes control at her own means and cost without the need to depend on a
source that in the end will not support her. A real woman doesn't need to be a feminist to
know that she is a woman.
'A woman’s dignity is lost the moment she
becomes a feminist'.
Chad C Rensburg 2014
